Three year old Mia loves the radio and constantly demands it
be switched on so she can sing and dance along. I enjoy it as well, since I
find current popular music sing-along-able again; unlike even a year ago when
all that hip hop and trance made me feel victimized (“is he yelling at me? What
did I do?”) and dated (“This must be a young-person song.”).
Her “favourite” (she has about 22) is “badaarex badaarex, no
trouble”. This is not, in fact, a jingle for a laxative but her interpretation
of Meghan Trainor’s song, ‘All about that bass, about that bass, no treble’. I
think it’s pretty catchy too, and initially thought it had a message that
matched my own convictions. But I’ve heard it so many times by now, that I’ve
started wondering if I really do agree with it. Yes, yay for women with big
asses, hooray that men sometimes like plump girls (what upright citizens such
men are!), and all that. On the surface this is a much better message to girls
than endless songs with names like “Let’s Do It Doggie Style and Then If You’re
Lucky I’ll Spank You”.
But it gets me thinking: we are still reassuring ourselves about
our appearances on the condition that men like us that way. Not to mention how
disturbing it is that a mother would comfort her presumably fat-bottomed young
daughter with assurances of “men like a little more bootie to hold at night”.
Name one song where a male singer moans about having a big
bum or being overweight; and suffers a consequent crisis of confidence about
his sexual appeal. Something along the lines of “That Hottie Ain’t Gonna Let Me
Hit That Because I Ain’t a Skinny Thang.”
I’m not blaming the creators of the song, they’re addressing
a real issue with all us girls and women. My problem is why we have this issue
in the first place.
It’s not only music. Look at movies. Or at least the more
conventional, popular sort of cinema not starring Dame Judi Dench in the lead.
The heroine will meet her man with a soft light irradiating her features, her
hair billowing in an invisible zephyr; and the hero will blink a few times, so
dazzled he is by her beauty. He will tell people or the woman herself at a
later point of the movie with a beatific smile; “THAT was the very moment I
knew I wanted to spend the rest of my life with her, because she was the most
beautiful woman I had ever seen…”
Really? Really? Where is the connection? It is rarely when
the hero sees her helping a blind guy across the street, or because she’s
hilarious and makes him laugh; or because she’s good at what she does (all
criteria for the heroines to fall for the hero, by the way.) Even if she is
shown doing any or all of these things; the hero will only fall (or realize
that he’s fallen) in love with the woman when her hair is well-conditioned, her
skin is doing this bizarre shining thing and she’s preferably wearing something
low cut.
That’s when the slow motion kicks in and the face sucking
ensues. Why? Is beauty the only quality men look for in women? And this is not
always a type of beauty that can be directly related to good health or
fertility; a desire for which we are told is biologically hardwired into men; since
the demand for sickly stick-insect women is a common cause for angst among more
‘traditionally built’ women.
Wouldn’t something like being a good human being, or a good
companion be a better indicator of who the hero “KNEW” he HAD to spend the rest of his life with? Why don’t any of
the heroines EVER say, “he was the cutest guy I’d ever seen, so it was
imperative I spend every day with him until I died.”
You know why? Because it’s a stupid thing to say, that’s
what. But somehow, when the man says it, it’s completely understandable --
because beauty is such a supreme achievement, such a product of extreme hard work
in a woman. It is not at all an accident of nature that your nose lines up in a
pleasant way with your mouth, which is at a suitable distance from your chin
and so on.
I know it sounds like sour grapes…it probably is, but it doesn’t
make what I say less true.
You would think books would be slightly better. Literature
being, nowadays, more of an acquired taste. Regrettably, for a female character
to be understood, her looks are to be dissected exhaustively. More often than
not, she is beautiful. If not; a big deal will be made of how, even though she isn’t
conventionally beautiful – a big mouth or curly hair often being the rather
pleasing culprits – she is beautiful, none the less; which the hero will tell
her at some point much to her surprise and gratification. It is a complete
cop-out by an author if ever I’ve seen one.
If the book goes so far as have an honest-to-goodness plain
(never ugly) female protagonist, her romantic interest will still think her the
most beautiful woman in the world. Because after all---a man cannot want to be
with her unless deluded into believing this. Or he is conveniently struck blind
so that he is spared the pain of watching an already plain woman degenerate
into middle-aged ugliness, like Mr. Rochester.
Rarely is the main female character (in a romantic scenario)
ugly and/ or with a physical impairment like a limp -- though you will find literature
simply littered with such male characters. Case in point is JK Rowling’s new
Cormoran Strike series. He is called “pubehead” because of the unfortunate
texture of his hair (on his head) and has a prosthetic limb which frequently
gives him trouble. Enter the breathtakingly beautiful platinum blonde assistant
who helps him occasionally when his leg lets him down. She is so luminous a
specimen that no disguise can mask her beauty, leading to all sorts of tricky
situations.
Was making the primary female character beautiful so much
more important than her being an efficient undercover sleuth? I lost a great
deal of respect for the author after reading that part, let me tell you; though
I am a loyal fan of the Harry Potter series and its unfortunate looking female
character Hermione. It is unfortunate that Warner Brothers sold out and got a
pretty girl to play the character even though they were quite satisfied with
Ron looking like an overgrown rabbit.
Shrek was an endearing exception, though I doubt Fiona would
have been allowed to settle down with someone who wasn’t an ogre. If a woman is
ugly she should AT LEAST marry someone equally or more ugly than she. It’s only
right.
It worries me that my little girl is exposed to this toxic
attitude. (Along with far worse, more blatant sexist biases; but since we are all
aware of those they are far less subliminal and can be tackled effectively.)
The politically correct across all media will
mouth the ‘just be yourself’ tag; but it’ll usually be meant for the chubby boy
with the glasses rather than his female version. For girls, it’s “be yourself”,
as long as you look good. If you’re a chubby girl with glasses and weird hair,
please don’t be yourself…cue music for makeover scene, followed directly by the
desired boy gulping like a fish and paying her attention.
Of course, if one puts one’s mind to it there are plenty of
exceptions, like Little Miss Sunshine or Juno among recent movies. Much of Jane
Austen (bless that woman) and plenty more. But unless you are super selective
of what you read, hear and see -- the more urgent message being pounded into
the heads of anyone with two X chromosomes is if you’re plain you better get prettied
up, if you’re beyond- redemption-ugly you don’t deserve love, and ergo, be
forever relegated as a side character in a song, movie or book about someone
else.
Now that I’ve had time to think about it, why am I beating artists
up, when all they do is reflect life in their art? Or at any rate,
what most people think life should be like, and wish to see that in what they
read, see or hear?
While I myself am greatly appreciative of beauty; indeed, take pride in my daughter’s cuteness and occasionally try to de-ugly myself
before meeting a large gathering of unsuspecting people, it saddens me that
rather than it be one of many attributes a girl can or cannot acceptably have,
like a talent for dance or an ability to wiggle her ears – good looks is THE
first and last thing people will look for in her all her life.
And so it is, that perfectly good women are socially ignored
or passed over for their more aesthetically pleasing counterparts. Despite
sometimes (not always, of course, I know plenty beautiful AND wonderful women),
their having more to offer than the latter.
I think it’s a shame, that’s all.
1 comment:
Finally, a much awaited post :-). Enjoyed reading what you observed. But we are grooming our children like that. Our girls are angels, princess, dolls....basically beautiful. And boys are superheroes already.
Post a Comment